Homemade Laundry Soap

Several years ago, when my oldest (born in 2007) was little, we found that baby skin didn’t do so well with standard (ie. Tide) laundry detergent. We started using Dreft, which is formulated for sensitive skin. It’s not cheap though (and I’ve come to the belief that even the cheapest generic detergent isn’t cheap, but we’ll get to that.)

I had heard of people making their own laundry soap, and thought I’d look into it. It turns out it’s actually pretty easy, and really cheap. I’ve been making our family’s detergent for several years now. Whenever I do, people inevitably ask me how I do it.

It’s been a long time since I found the original recipe I’ve been using, so I’m sorry I can’t give it proper attribution, though I suspect the website I got it from didn’t properly attribute it themselves, so it’s arguably a moot point anyway.

The ingredients and process are fairly simple, and once you get the hang of it, the process goes fairly quickly.

  • 2/3 Bar of Fels Naptha Laundry Soap
  • 1 Cup Washing Soda (Made by the same people that make Baking Soda, but they’re not the same thing)
  • 1 Cup Borax

To start, fill a large cook pot with some water. I usually do 2-3 quarts, but it doesn’t need to be measured out, you just need enough to dissolve all of the dry ingredients.

Heat the water on medium heat on your stove. Again, it doesn’t matter too much how hot, just as long as it does not come to a boil.

Dissolve the Fels Naptha first. It will be a lot easier if it’s ground into tiny pieces. I like to use the food processor. Cut it into fairly small chunks and let the food processor grind it into powder.

You’re only going to need 2/3 of the bar. A bar is 5oz, so if you have a kitchen scale, you can measure out 3.3oz and bag the rest for a future batch.

Dissolve the soap. Then add the other ingredients. Compared to the soap, the rest should dissolve quickly and easily.

Once everything is dissolved, dump it all in a 5 gallon bucket. Then add enough water to get the total solution to 4 gallons. I have a mark on the inside of my bucket, and just fill to the line.

The solution will need to sit overnight. When it’s done, there will be a few inches of thick gel on the top, and liquid below. I mix it all together as good as I can. I use a large paint mixer that attaches to my drill. Get it as homogenous as possible. Once mixed, it can be put into smaller containers and stored for future use.

As for containers, I’ve found that some work much better than others. Milk jugs don’t work very well. They tend to spring leaks over time. The best containers I’ve found are orange juice jugs (the plastic ones, not the cardboard ones.) They eventually tend to spring leaks too, but I do have some that I’ve been using for several years, so they’re fairly reliable.

I also have some large, 5 gallon jugs my dad got me. I don’t know where he got them, but he tells me they’re for food-grade phosphate. He does residential water treatment, and gets the phosphate for equipment he sells and installs.


To use, shake up the container before each use, as the liquid will tend to separate.

We usually use about a half-cup per load of laundry.

This DOES work in front-loading, high efficiency washing machines. It is low-sudsing.

My wife does most of the laundry, but when I do a load, I treat it like any other detergent, and fill the liquid detergent reservoir in the machine to the fill line.

Once you’ve used this, and get used to the process of making it, you’ll find it’s as good as the store-bought stuff. It’s much cheaper though. A bar of Fels-Naptha is about $1.50, and you might use $1 worth of the other ingredients in each batch. That brings the cost to roughly 60ยข per gallon. If you’re used to paying nearly $20/gallon for Tide, you’ll love this stuff.

Discernment’s Lack of Discernment

It’s a new season, spring is coming to an end and summer is being ushered in. With that, yet another discernment ministry controversy that shouldn’t be.

It’s not my purpose here to discuss the scandal-of-the-month. Rather I wish to address the core problem that I’ve seen come up time and again with para-church ministries devoted to “discernment.” I’ve been a Christian for nearly two decades, and have seen many rise to national and international prominence, only to crash hard and leave people bitter and angry. As the internet becomes ubiquitous, they spawn acolytes that run blogs and spend copious amounts of time and energy on social media “exposing” every false teacher they can find. Like a child with a hammer, everything they see becomes a nail.

To be fair, I’ve seen many discernment ministries start off strong, and remain that way (sometimes) for many, many years. They’re able to properly spot error, warn believers that it’s there, and steer people away from it. They perform a valuable service to Christ’s church. Sadly, however, most that I’ve seen eventually lose their proper focus. Things quickly go from strong and valuable, to dangerous and ill-serving.

What causes the inevitable fall? Well, there are many possibilities, all ultimately pointing to our common, sinful nature. However, it all often boils down to following. The discernment ministries gather such an impressive following that they must do what they can to maintain and/or grow the following, lest their ministry shrink and die. It’s a loss of focus on whom they serve.

It was easier for me to see the problems with good discernment ministries gone bad by looking at the good discernment ministries that are still good. So which ones do I consider to be good? There are just a few, and I don’t necessarily agree with everything they say or do. Justin Peters and Chris Rosebrough are two good ones around today, and the late Ken Silva is a third that we’re at a loss not having with us any longer. (Note, I see a difference between apologetics ministry and discernment. Typically, apologetics ministries are good at avoiding the problem I’m about to discuss with discernment ministries. I don’t see any difference between self-described discernment ministries and polemics ministries; they end up being different sides of the same ministerial coin.)

Justin Peters has a ministry that educates people on the heresies within the Word-Faith movement. He will get into other areas that have a lot of overlap with Word-Faith, but Word-Faith is his strength, and he rarely wanders more than arms-length from it.

Chris Rosebrough is very strong on New Apostolic Reformation, Emergent Church, and the Seeker-Driven movements. His daily internet show, Pirate Christian Radio, focuses on comparing bad teaching in churches to what the Bible says, and most often focuses on these areas. Chris, like Justin, knows his strengths, and sticks to them.

Where the good ministries gone bad start their downward trend is burning out on their strengths. They build a sizable following by rightly calling out error in an area they have taken time to become knowledgable in. Eventually, though, they end up getting to a place where they cannot grow any more without making changes. Some of them have put aside past careers, and have become dependent upon the financial support that their ministries generate. To stop growing means certain financial ruin.

The only way to grow is to expand the focus. No longer can they educate only on the area that made their ministries thrive, they have to find more. This is where they inevitably fall apart. They become a hammer, looking for nails. Now, everyone who teaches a squishy (yet not necessarily heretical) teaching is seen as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Articulating a prayer in the wrong way becomes a focus of their attention. No longer do these ministries go after just wolves, they have to turn their attention to wayward sheep (and often the sheep aren’t even wayward, they’re just doing things differently.) At this point, things escalate, and we end up with the seasonal controversy. Heels dig in, and battle lines are drawn. It never ends well, and it never benefits the Lord’s Church.

The alternative to growth into areas outside of their expertise is to account for the growth that comes in your followers over time and their inevitable move onto other things. They’ve gotten as much out of the ministry as they can and they find other ministries that help them grow in other areas. This means that you’re always looking for new followers who aren’t strong in the area that these ministries focus on. I like Chris Rosebrough, but I am familiar with the teachings of the churches that he critiques, and no longer need his commentary to know what’s wrong with it. I listen to “Pirate Christian Radio” only very occasionally. That’s okay. There are many people out there that don’t have the experience or wisdom to see the error in New Apostolic or Seeker-Driven, and they can benefit from time spent listening to Chris. He has a fun personality too, so he can entertain while he teaches.

Apologetics ministries may have problems, but they rarely have the same problem as discernment ministries. It takes time to study a false system and learn how to engage it with the Gospel. Years may be spent learning the beliefs of a cult, or the doctrines of a false religious system. There’s too much invested to start over and try another cult or religion. Apologists more often plant their flag and do their work, they don’t trouble themselves with growth, and most often growth is not necessary to their continued existence.

I’ve learned, after nearly two decades, never to become too invested in discernment ministries. Support and follow them when they’re strong, but be willing to rebuke them when they lose focus. Don’t put them on a pedestal. Don’t invest in them as super-human heroes. Recognize that they’re sinful humans like the rest of us.

Our Summer Home Buying Experience, Part 4: Wait, There’s More!

After over a year of getting our house ready to put on the market, and a summer of Real Estate process, we had two signed deals. We had a new house to look forward to moving into, and our old house was sold. All that was left was to move, clean, and turn over the keys to the old place.

The lessons weren’t over yet though.
Read the rest of this entry »

Our Summer Home Buying Experience, Part 3: What I Learned

After a summer of Real estate searches and dealings, I learned a lot. We had bought a new house, and had just gotten a deal signed to sell our old one.

Here’s what I would do over again, and what I would do differently:

First, I would use the same agent again. He’s still a friend, and though things got really stressful at times, he never violated my trust.

That said, I did see behind the curtain a little, and would change how I handle things based on the experience I went through.

The first change I would make is that I would pay a few hundred dollars for an appraiser to go through the house before the sale. The whole system of “comps” is really terrible, and shouldn’t be taken seriously as anything more than a very rough starting point. They tell what the square footage is of homes sold, and the price sold for. You divide the second by the first to get the cost per square foot, which you can use to decide where to set your starting price. This doesn’t tell you other things that are valuable though, such as the amount of renovations a house has had, or the amount of disrepair it’s in. Inspections will tell you if there are serious problems you’ve overlooked, and an appraisal will tell you what a bank would be willing to lend a buyer for the house.

That’s a really valuable piece of information. Our house had to go through appraisal before our buyers’ bank would approve their mortgage, but they don’t provide any information to the sellers except “sufficient value.” In other words, we didn’t arrive at a sale price that was too high, but we’ll never know if it was too low. While you’ll never know what would have happened if the house remained on the market a few more days, knowing what a bank would lend on it would give a much better idea if you’re in the right ballpark.

Another thing I learned was regarding home improvements. In the end, it seemed that we never got out of our house what we put into it. The improvements were nice, and they probably helped sell the house FASTER than if I hadn’t done them, but they didn’t get us a HIGHER PRICE. I will weigh all future home improvements against that lesson. Fortunately, most of what I did was necessary for getting a decent sale though. The biggest thing I did was remodel a basement bathroom, which I really had no choice about. The tile was falling off the walls in the shower, and no buyer would have overlooked it. I also replaced the carpet in the living area with bamboo flooring. The carpets were just worn out and in rough shape. I could have left them, but they would have been a big weapon against us for negotiations.

The biggest area in home improvements that hurt us was the windows. I had replaced almost all of the windows in the house. When I started, I didn’t plan to sell the house, so I got nice windows that I liked and wanted for my house. In the end, I would have been better off with cheaper windows that ended up in someone else’s house.

Lesson learned in home improvements: don’t do them to fetch a higher selling price. Do them to either sell faster, or to enjoy the house more while you still live in it.

Another lesson I walked away with, in addition to getting an appraisal and being more mindful of proper home improvement projects is to have a tighter game plan ahead of negotiations. We never told our agent what our top price was when we bought, nor our bottom price when we sold, and I wouldn’t change that. However, have a top when buying and a bottom when selling and stick to it. Don’t let the other side intimidate you into giving up on them. We never regretted coming up on our buy price; his house just wasn’t worth what he wanted for it; and we got a better house in the end. However, we gave up our strong position on the sell side because the buyers threatened to walk if we either took too long to reach an agreement or didn’t come down enough. Think about it, they lost out on another buy because they low-balled a seller and the seller got a better deal. If they wanted our house bad enough, they would have learned not to low-ball sellers and lose out on deals in a sellers’ market. My mother-in-law was disappointed that we took the first offer, and told us she would have rather waited to get her share of the sale price of the house (the remaining balance of the mortgage, including the last few payments) and had us get a price we were happy with.

The next post will be the last, and will be “wait, there’s more.”

Our Summer Home Buying Experience, Part 2: Selling Our Old House

We spent our summer deep in Real estate; selling one house and buying another. It had been the culmination of more than a year’s worth of work, preparing our house for the market. In the first post, I described the back-story and the process leading up to the purchase of our new house. Now I’ll talk a little about my experience selling the old house.

As I mentioned, it was my first time buying, and my first time selling. I had spent my entire time in the house we were in (that I married into) improving things here and there. Many improvements were small, but there were a few bigger projects too. The architect in me always wanted to make the house better, and the do-it-yourselfer in me always wanted to increase the value through sweat equity.

I was working right up to the very end. In fact, we had signed a purchase agreement to buy a new house before I was ready to put the old one on the market. I knew I was close though, so having a closing date for the new house would be motivation to get the job done.

It was the selling side of things that taught me the most about the process. Being a buyer before the house hit the market, I knew what the mindset was, and what buyers would be looking at when they considered my house. I knew that Realtors point clients to “comps” or comparable homes in the area to determine fair market price. I also knew that, though buyers would want to negotiate, the lower the starting price, the closer you’ll be in the end to asking price.
Read the rest of this entry »

Our Summer Home Buying Experience, Part 1: Buying a New House

Over the course of last summer, we went through the process of selling our house and buying a new one. Our family is growing, and the house we had was closing in on us. We also had a healthy amount of equity built up, and thought our need for more space was an opportunity to look for something a bit nicer too.

This was to be my first time both buying and selling. I married into the house we were moving out of, and didn’t get to experience the process of buying the house when my wife acquired it. It was quite a process, and I have wanted to share my experience ever since. There are things that went really well, and other parts of the process I will do differently next time (if we ever have a next time.)

We did things a little backward, beginning with the buy rather than the sell. We are very blessed in that my in-laws are our “bank,” holding both the mortgage of the house we sold and the new house. This gave us freedom, and in some cases power, we couldn’t squander.

Another aspect of this experience was using a Realtor that we knew and trusted. He is an elder at our church, and a friend. We had an understanding going back a year or two that won him our business. I’m now a licensed architect, and had hoped to buy a lot and build a house. Our Realtor moved over from home construction to Realty a few years ago when the economy forced him out of work. He had about two decades experience building houses. He was going to act as my mentor in the process of building, and I would use him as my Realtor when it was time to sell our house. We couldn’t find a reasonably priced lot anywhere, and eventually abandoned our hopes of building. Since we had an established relationship, and a pre-existing agreement, we thought it only natural to use him anyway.

Having a Realtor is really helpful, and though some people get burned by Realtors and swear them off, there is real value to a good Realtor. Good ones do a lot of work behind the scenes that you never see, and it’s a (partially, at least) thankless job.

When we got serious about looking at houses, he set us up with an MLS search that would alert us to new listings. We would scour the listings matching our search criteria, find homes we thought we might like, and he would arrange for showings.
Read the rest of this entry »

Why I Plan to Vote for Jill Stein (Green Party) on Tuesday

A couple weeks ago, I wrote why I’m not voting for Donald Trump. The big question that evokes is: who AM I voting for then?

I’ve decided to vote for Jill Stein, Green Party candidate for President. Here’s why:

As I explained in that previous post, Hillary Clinton will win Minnesota. It doesn’t matter who I vote for, she will win Minnesota. In the past, I’ve cast protest votes for Constitution Party candidates. Since they best represent me, they were the natural choice. However, I’ve been convinced that another strategy might be better for Minnesota.

You see, here in Minnesota, if a minor party’s candidate receives 5% of the vote, they are given major party status for subsequent elections. I don’t recall for how long, but it seems to be about ten years. In the past, this has hurt the Republicans a lot. Jesse Ventura won the Governor’s race in 1998 running as the Independence Party candidate. This gave the Independence Party major party status for years after that. They got a slot in debates, they got state matching funds, and all of the other privileges that come with major party status. Since the Independence Party tends to be fiscally more Conservative (more-so than the Democrats at least), they have done a lot to siphon off support of Republicans in subsequent races, and help the Democrats enjoy an easier path to victory.

So, being a much more Leftist party, I’d like to return the favor by doing my part to help the Green Party achieve major party status in Minnesota. My hope is that she’ll get to 5% in Minnesota next week, and the Green Party can then help siphon votes away from the Democrats in the next governor’s race in two years.

It’s really a vote to add chaos to the Democrat campaign in the next statewide election.

The Electoral College and Why I’m Not Voting for Donald Trump (But Maybe You Should)

It’s that time again: Presidential election season. Every four years, I’ve endured an onslaught of lectures about why I need to vote for the GOP candidate. Aside from a single lapse in judgment, I’ve never done it though.

It sure sounds compelling; if you don’t vote directly for the GOP candidate, You’re voting indirectly for the Democrat. Never mind that the same logic could be used to demonstrate that a third party vote is an indirect vote for the Republican, logic is hard.

Every election I’ve paid attention to brings with it a slew of political junkies rehashing the same old tired arguments, usually accompanied by rhetoric suggesting that if you don’t vote exactly as the junky tells you to, you’re a horrible person.

Usually, they have an answer for every argument that can be made to the contrary, no matter how compelling or logical.

Except one.

This year I’ve been making a new argument, and no one, anywhere, seems to have a counter argument for it. Most won’t even acknowledge that they understand it. Thus the reason for this post.

My argument stems from the situation here in my home state of Minnesota. You see, Minnesota has consistently been won by the Democrat candidate in every election since 1976. When every other state in the union went to Ronald Reagan in 1984, Minnesota was joined only by the District of Columbia in handing electoral college votes to Walter Mondale. It was a blood bath, and though Minnesota will never collectively admit it, it was embarrased in 1984.

So what’s my point? Let’s take a step back and just acknowledge the elephant in the room from that (and every other) election; that we don’t have one national election for President. We have 50 state and one district election that each sends delegates to the Electoral College, and it’s the Electoral College that votes for the President. 538 people, selected by the voters of their state, do the actual voting for President.

Here’s a short video by Prager University that explains it.

So what difference does that make in how I vote, or how you vote? That’s the really ironic part. Ironic, because the Prager in Prager University is Dennis Prager, Conservative radio talk show host. Ironic because Dennis Prager lives in Southern California. Ironic because Dennis Prager is one of those junkies I mentioned earlier who suggests that if you don’t vote for the GOP candidate, you’re a horrible person. Ironic because no matter how Dennis Prager votes, his state (California) will award it’s 55 Electors to Hillary Clinton. It’s not expected to even be close. At the time of this writing, Real Clear Politics, which tracks the averages of several reputable polls, has Clinton ahead by nearly 20% in California.

So let’s go back to Minnesota, my own home state. Like I said, Minnesota last sent Republican electors to the Electoral College in 1972. Richard Nixon was the last Republican candidate for President to win the North Star State.

So what does that have to do with how I vote? Well, it has a lot to do with how I vote, actually. You see, I mentioned earlier that, with one exception, I have never voted for the Republican candidate for President. It wouldn’t have mattered if I did, either. Had I, and every other person who voted for a Conservative third party candidate voted, instead, for the Republican; the Democrat still would have won Minnesota. And If every Conservative in California votes for Donald Trump in two weeks, Hillary Clinton will still win that state’s 55 Electors.

Instead of voting for the Republican, I have always voted for the candidate that I actually like best. Why not? Many people will say that’s a wasted vote; but what does it mean to waste your vote? If you ask me, voting for someone you don’t like, just because he’s running for one of the two major parties and is less repugnant than the other major party candidate, even if that candidate can’t win your state’s Electoral votes is the very definition of a wasted vote.

The important thing to understand here, the very point of this blog article, is that the Electoral College matters. It’s not just a civics exercise; just academics, it actually matters. As a Minnesota Conservative who doesn’t like Donald Trump, voting for Donald Trump would be a wasted vote.

Let’s look at another state though. Minnesota and California are solidly Democratic states (at least in their preference for Presidential candidates.) But what about Ohio, or Florida? Those two states (and others) have been “swing states” for quite some time. In swing states, voting for the “lesser evil” candidate can make a real difference in how the Electors from those states are awarded. By not voting for the Republican candidate, you might give the Democrat Candidate the opportunity to win the state with one fewer vote than he (or she in the case of this particular election cycle) would otherwise need. With all of the efforts that Democrats typically put into “Get out the vote” drives, this can be a big help to their cause.

If I lived in Ohio, I would probably hold my nose and vote for Donald Trump. When people question me, I would probably give a logical and conscientious reason why voting for the “lesser evil” is what my conscience instructs me to do.

What about solidly Conservative states? States like Texas and Arizona have been consistent wins for the Republican candidate as long as I’ve been old enough to vote. What would I do there? Again, I would strongly consider casting a “lesser of two evils” vote. States move from Conservative states to swing states without warning, and from swing states to Liberal states with equal warning. Don’t take your neighbors for granted and assume that they will cover for you, vote as though you were in a swing state because you just might be and not know it yet. If your conscience still says that you cannot vote for a man with poor character, then vote for the candidate who has the character necessary to earn your vote.

So you’re probably wondering just who I will vote for in two weeks. To be honest, I haven’t decided. Perhaps I’ll do another post sometime explaining my thinking this time around. We shall see.

Thwarting Telemarketers

I’ve posted before about Asterisk, the computerized phone system I’ve been using in my home for about a decade now. One thing I love about it is kicking calls over to special functions based on Caller ID. Known telemarketers get a tone and a message saying the number has been disconnected.

I just wish that was available on my cell phone!

I have a spare phone that sits on the counter, permanently plugged in to the wall to keep the battery charged. Our plan was actually cheaper to have this unused phone than to not have it, so we have it. It has been getting calls every few days, probably people calling the person that used to have the number. I ask telemarketers to add us to their ‘Do Not Call’ list, but they then ask what number to add. I don’t know, it’s a spare phone I never use.

So I took the audio from Asterisk and made it the voicemail greeting on this spare phone. Here it is, in case people have a use for it.

Favorite Podcasts

I love podcasts! I’ve been listening to them for about 10 years, and am always finding new ones that I like. I started podcasting in 2008 myself because I liked listening to them so much. I’ve pondered getting satellite radio a few times over the last decade, but always quickly remind myself that podcasts are better. They’re on-demand, and can be downloaded locally so they don’t need an internet connection or clear view of the sky to listen.

My list changes from time to time, but I wanted to share the ones I enjoy. I’m breaking it down into two lists; one is Christian, and the other is not. The “not” list includes tech podcasts, politics, general interest, or whatever doesn’t fit the category “Christian”.

I also want to note that I don’t get to listen to podcasts nearly as much as I would like. Some of the entries below I listen only very occasionally, but I still count them among my favorites.

General Interest

I just wish I had more time to listen. I’ve been trying to break myself of one habit for years that would help a little in that regard. I mentally treat podcasts differently than radio. If I have a podcast on in one room and need to leave the room, answer the phone, or take my attention away for any other reason, I pause it first. It’s a habit I just can’t break, I live in a DVR world where we don’t have to miss anything because of an interruption. I could get through more if I made a playlist in the morning and didn’t touch it for the rest of the day, it would be more like tuning to my favorite radio station and leaving it on all day.

Note: the links to the right under “Favorite podcasts” like the other links over there, get updated about as often as the makeup of the US Congress, if not less often. Don’t be surprised that they don’t match up perfectly.